Reviewer Policy

Reviewers are going to be expected to be skilled, honest, courteous, prompt, and constructive. the specified major components of a high-quality review ought to be as follows: Reviewers are going to be expected to be skilled, honest, courteous, prompt, and constructive. the specified major components of a high-quality review ought to be as follows: international journal of engineering and technology.

The shopper ought to have recognized and expressed on major professionals and cons of analysis style and methodology The reviewer ought to provide opinion dead and with success upon the tone of the writer’s creating of the data, like quotation of its limitations.

The reviewer ought to opinion on major sturdy points and foibles of the manuscript as a written interaction, freelance of the aim, technique, results, and presentation of the subject.international journal of engineering and technology.

The reviewer ought to reply to any ethical problems said by the study, or any potential reasons of low standards of scientific actions. The reviewer ought to offer the origin with helpful recommendations for improvement of the holograph.

The examination ought to offer the editor the proper setting and perspective to form a determination on acceptance (and/or revision) of the holograph. All evaluators ought to learn of the publication’s objectives and publishers ought to produce positive you develop them and suggest educational materials .

The editors ought to frequently assess all opinions for quality; they will conjointly modify opinions before business them to writers, or just not publish them if they sense they’re not helpful or applicable. numerous analysis fine quality and alternative potency options of evaluators ought to be frequently analyzed to confirm most potency, and should cause decisions on reappointment or continuous analysis demands.